Finally, an actual innovation in helmet technology

Dailies -



Motorcycle crash helmets have essentially been the same old thing since they were invented 60+ years ago — an energy absorbing chunk of styrofoam glued into a hard outer shell. Sure, some have better graphics or neato vents or whatever, but that’s the basic technology. Now, a tiny company in California is bringing actual technical innovation to that formula, all in the name of reducing concussions that result from low-speed impacts.

That styrofoam and shell formula is actually really good at dealing with large impacts. The density of the styrofoam (or “EPS” as people with a vested interest in making this stuff sound expensive call it) can be varied with great specificity, allowing controlled deceleration of the head. What it’s not terribly good at is reducing shocks from low-speed impacts.

If you recall the Del Rosario helmet concept (still in progress), it addressed the absorption of low-speed energy with gel inserts between its carbon arches and the shell. This new 6D helmet does something similar, affixing gel between the two layers of styrofoam. It locates that gel between two discs (one on each layer of EPS) that move in six different direction, hence the “6D.”

We asked John Del Rosario to take a look at the 6D design for us. “This is actually pretty neat, separating the high & low impacts is the key,” he says. “Gel-type material affixed between two plates is what gives it the multidirectional and damping qualities, I’d say it should fit in great in motocross because of the lower speed type of impacts.”

Here, you can see the gel dampers located between the two layers of EPS and the gap that doubles as extra ventilation.

Traditional Snell and ECE-rated helmets work well in impacts above 9mph, but struggle to provide energy absorption at lower speeds. At 9mph, that force can be up to 120g, double the threshold at which concussions begin to occur.

The gel dampers in the 6D helmet are designed to provide that low-speed protection, while traditional styrofoam remains to deal with faster hits.

At 4.5mph, the 6D transfers 49g of force to the riders’ head. An ECE helmet will transfer 79g at the same speed.

Such low speeds may sound a bit silly, but most accidents on motocross tracks or while riding off-road simply involve falling to the ground. The quoted speeds above aren’t how fast you’re riding, they’re the speed at which your helmet collides with something.


Other innovations should help boost safety a little bit too. There’s cutaways in the shell where the helmet would meet the clavicle in an impact, designed to reduce collar bone breaks and there’s padding on the chin designed to absorb energy from either face plants or the helmet ramming into the sternum. As with many other helmets sporting a dirt peak, the screws are designed to shear away on impact, preventing forced rotation of the head. The gap between the two layers of styrofoam made necessary by the gel dampers is also used to flow extra air.

6D claims there’s not a substantial increase in weight compared to traditional helmets, but we’d worry a bit about additional bulk. The outer circumference of the
helmet may need to be larger to accomodate that new found gap between EPS layers.

Sales of the ATR-1 motocross helmet are slated to begin in February, 2013, no price has yet been announced, but the general consensus seems to be that the 6D will be one of the pricier motocross lids on the market. A street version dubbed the ATS-1 is also under development.

  • Glenngineer

    Would have loved that collarbone saving feature this summer…

    This looks awesome. I’m curious about how the performance space plays out between small bump efficacy and increased size and weight.

  • Adrian MacGeraghty

    I want this. Don’t care about added bulk – this thing is like a second dura mater for your brain. Want it, need it, ASAP.

  • Aaron Trent

    This is a hugely important area, thanks for sharing!

  • karlInSanDiego

    I read that a good way to think of many street offs is to consider a similar fall from a static bike. Though you may be going 35 mph, your body is mostly having to deal with your head traveling to the ground from your seating position. Of course many crashes will involve an immovable object but even the much maligned high side usually involve a noggin fall from 6 or so feet and if you have a full helmet that slides and doesn’t catch, many crashes end up with one drop from standing height. Witness Doohan and Chili performing syncronized highsides, and then watch as Chili tries to replace his detached gas tank to resume the race!

  • Lawrences

    Great concept… will it come in 1942 Werhrmacht?

  • Ben W

    The tone of this article sounds just like the tone in that Del Rosario and the old Lazer SuperSkin helmet writeups. “Finally, the technology is here!”

    I love innovation like this, but dang if it isn’t frustrating waiting.

  • Sasha Pave

    Great to see some innovation here. If this helps the lifespan of a helmet then there’s a good cost savings angle too. Nothing worse than ditching a $500 helmet from a low impact hit.

  • Marc Fenigstein

    Looks like this should also help significantly with shearing loads (your skull rotating so quickly that your brain shears away from the skull wall), which may be as important for concussions as impacts/g loading, and no helmet really addresses. Exciting stuff.

  • RandySasaki

    I posted something just like this months ago on

  • Nicholas

    these helmets are really awesome, after seeing justin
    bogle’s crash and believing that helmet saved his head from an injury I
    found them available online at big st charles motorsports


    Obviously hasn’t seen the greatest development in motorsports helmets with Rear Vision in helmets..