RideApart Review: Yamaha Super Tenere

Reviews -

By

yamaha-supertenere

“Super Tenere” one of the most legendary names in the Adventure segment, but also one that’s been defunct for decades. Can this all new, heavyweight Yamaha Super Tenere live up to its namesake?

What’s New:
There’s no doubting which bike Yamaha’s new Super Ténéré is pitched at. In fact, it’s almost a copy of the BMW R1200GS…

The German machine absolutely dominates the Adventure class, and now with a water-cooled motor, it’s looking as strong as it ever has. There have been a few would-be rivals, but none which on paper at least have looked like presenting such a direct challenge as the Yamaha. Ducati’s Multistrada is certainly stealing sales, and it’s the first bike to do so with any significance, but even this is not quite the same kind of machine: it overlaps the BMW’s portfolio, no question, but it has its own, unique properties too and doesn’t match the German bike for rugged, off-road appeal.

The Yamaha certainly does. Its power output is the same as the old, air-cooled GS at 108bhp, it has a 19-inch front wheel, 1199cc engine against the BMW’s 1170cc, twin cylinders, an aluminum luggage option, and it’s clearly designed for some fairly serious rough stuff as well as long distance touring. There’s even some proper heritage, as Yamaha is joint highest Paris-Dakar winner along with KTM.

The Super Ténéré doesn’t have quite the street presence of the GS (even if that’s now rather dulled by familiarity), but it’s still a large machine with an imposing riding position. It’s heavy too when you’re wheeling it around, confirmed by the spec sheet which says it’s 261kg (576lb) with a full tank against the GS’s 238kg (525lb), but fire up the motor, get the bike rolling under its own steam and its outstanding balance means the mass on the whole doesn’t interfere with the handling. The overriding sensation at all speeds is one of stability: around town you can trickle the big Yamaha down to walking pace with barely a wobble, and stop it dead for a while before needing to put a foot down.

Increase the pace on a motorway and it tracks true and steady, and keeps doing so at well over 100mph (160kph), while on twisty roads it’s enjoyable for tracking precisely and with more feedback from the tyres than you get on a GS. The Bridgestone Battle Wings are worth a special mention for their extraordinary grip in all sorts of conditions, including wet and slippery, although they’re very biased towards tarmac in their dual purpose role and won’t help you out much in soft off-road going.

What’s Good:
The front is more plush as well as communicative, flying the flag for conventional forks over BMW’s Telelever, and thanks to the linked braking system, front end dive (almost zero on the GS) isn’t too severe either, despite the 220mm (8.7in) of travel. If you pull on the handlebar lever before touching the rear brake, the system automatically distributes some of the braking force to the rear calliper, according to load as well as applied stopping force, and this helps keep the bike especially stable when slowing, even when the ABS starts to chime in.

Push the rear brake pedal before you pull the lever however and the system doesn’t activate, leaving you with conventional braking which is more useful in some circumstances, such as fine speed control in U-turns. What you can’t do is switch the ABS off, which won’t bother 100 per cent road riders, but will raise an eyebrow in those who thought the Super Ténéré was intended for off-road use too. In practice this won’t matter too much as the ABS was remarkably good when I found some soft sand to try it in, still slowing the bike rather than letting it run on, as most systems do in very loose going. Even so, deleting the ability to lock up a wheel does detract from the bike as an off-road package.

But it’s Super Ténéré as tourer which matters to most, and most of what you need is in place. The fuel range is good, the 6.0-gallon tank being enough for more than 200 miles . Economy on the trip varied between 37.5mpg in gentle riding to 33.3mpg, which means a range to dry of 200-225 miles, although I suspect harder use will see this fall to the mid thirties mpg. The on-board fuel computer was consistently optimistic by around 6 percent, so be wary of claims you might read judged on this alone.

The bike itself is very stable with two people on board. You need to jack up the rear spring preload by hand (no electronic suspension here, even as an option), but this is straightforward and there’s an easy-to-read height indicator so you know how far you’ve done it, and where to set it back for solo riding. Once set up for two, the bike is impressively secure and easy steering.

The performance isn’t affected too badly by carrying a passenger either, although with so much weight to haul about even solo, the proportional increase isn’t so great. But this is where the Super Ténéré will disappoint. Where the BMW is lively and willing – especially the 2010 and on models with the double overhead cams – the Yamaha can sometimes feel labored. There’s not so much oomph at low revs, and while the mid-range is reasonably strong, it starts to fade as you rev it hard. The BMW simply feels more muscular and alive, on top of which the boxer twin’s thumpier feel and distinctive exhaust note add character where the Yamaha is smoother, quieter and for those reasons, bland.

What’s Bad:
Where the Yamaha gives way to the BMW is in agility. It responds to handlebar input well enough but lacks the speed of direction change of the German bike, giving it a more business like and less lively feel. But like the GS there’s little reaction from the rear suspension to the shaft drive, despite its simplicity, although the ride quality does suffer for the extra mass compared with chain drive, something you notice particularly as harshness and thumping at high speeds across ridges and pothole edges.

These days the cost of fuel is increasingly important as well as outright range, and here the Yamaha suffers against the frugal BMW, which I’d judge is around 15 per cent better – that manages a similar range with a 5.3 gallon capacity.

Comfort is up to the mark too, although you might need to juggle screen and seat height to minimize turbulence. It’s not buffeting which is the problem so much as noise, which is excessive at normal motorway speeds if you’re a touch too tall. There’s a higher accessory screen which might help, and the standard one can be raised, although this is unnecessarily time consuming: first remove the seat to access an Allen key. Next use that to remove the right fairing panel and take out the toolkit. Then undo the four screen screws, and lever out the threaded grommets they locate in. Move these to the higher holes and bolt the screen back on, then clear up the tools…

Not something you’ll be doing between town and countryside then. The problem is the screen is very far away from the rider. I have long arms and sitting normally couldn’t reach the screen with one arm stretched out – not that you need to, but it demonstrates the distance. If you can get it right, the noise is still quite high but acceptable, and while there’s some vibration from the air, it’s not too bad.

This arm-waving does demonstrate an ergonomic annoyance, which is the button to scroll through the on-board computer display (economy and ambient temperature as well as the basics) is positioned on the dash rather than on the left switchgear, as Ducati and BMW do, which means it’s a big stretch whenever you want to look at the info.

The panniers will irritate too as you can’t leave them unlocked, so every time you want to open one you have to remove the bike’s ignition key. Then the pannier lock is fiddly and stiff, the latch unconvincing, and you can only open the lid from the back end, where BMW’s clever design allows you to open from either end or take the lid off altogether. I’d go for some Touratech ones instead.

They don’t help the pillion either, pushing the passenger’s feet forwards on the footrests which means your thighs start to ache as you hold yourself forward. With this luggage fitted you’ll need either a backrest (such as the optional topbox) or just snuggle up to the rider and hold on. In all other respects the rear accommodation is very good, with no nasty turbulence, plenty of room and well placed grab handles (although these don’t feel great to hold for long periods).

In most circumstances it’s sufficient, if unexciting, but given extra to do, such as adding a passenger or as we did on our route, climbing to 5,000 feet and higher in thinning air, then you start to need to work the gearbox to maintain pace. You find the twistgrip against the stop sometimes, which on a 1200 twin it really shouldn’t be.

There are two engine map options, Touring and Sport, but after trying Touring for about 15 minutes, I never used it again in 600 miles, regardless of conditions, it gave the engine such a flat feel. Sport is crisper but it’s hardly going to scare you, even in the wet or off-road.
Vibration levels are always manageable, and better at high revs than on earlier BMW GSs, although the 2010 model is much improved in this respect. You feel some at speed on the motorway but it’s not intrusive.

The Verdict:
Like those cruiser copies compared to Harley originals, to buy a Super Ténéré you really have to not want a BMW, or specifically want a Yamaha. For some this will be enough: Yamaha’s reliability will probably be better (though R1 crank and clutch issues mean this isn’t guaranteed), and the sheer number of GSs around means there’s appeal in having something different. But where a Multistrada adds a unique Ducati angle to the adventure bike theme – ultra high performance and cutting edge electronics – the Yamaha offers nothing new. 
It’s a perfectly good bike and a fine long distance tourer, but the GS has more options, is only slightly more expensive, lighter and is more fun.

RideApart Rating: 8/10

  • Mugget

    Interesting that you can ride this down to a walking pace and even stop (briefly) without putting a foot down.

    I routinely do the same thing on my Gixxer, but that took probably over a year of riding at walking pace through traffic 5 days a week. Presumably this can be done on the Super Ténéré within a short time of hopping aboard? That does say a lot about the stability!

    • http://www.facebook.com/brett.lewis3 Brett Lewis

      Once the bike is motionless, I don’t believe it matters what bike you’re on so much. I learned to keep my balance when stopped on a lightweight dual sport and then practiced it on every other bike. Once you get a good feel for any bike, it’s easy. I bought an older FJR 2 weeks ago, and I can already balance it at a stop even though it’s the heaviest bike I’ve ever owned. Practice is the key.

  • Campisi

    Why did this rate at eight out of ten? The review reads far less positive than the rating would suggest.

    • Ceol Mor

      Ignore the rating system — it’s pure rubbish. Just as a Wine Spectator rating shouldn’t cloud your opinion about a bottle of wine, neither should a rating attached to a motorcycle. After all, exactly how is “desirability” calculated in RideApart’s “objective” rating system? Gimme a break.

      • Campisi

        I understand and don’t mind that the rating system is subjective. I just found it odd that the subjective numerical rating was far more positive than the subjective prose would imply.

    • http://www.facebook.com/brett.lewis3 Brett Lewis

      I wonder too. It gets the same rating as the GS, which is supposedly superior.

    • Stuki

      This written review is the late Kevin Ash’s. While the rating is probably Wes and co’s.

      For those with some history of riding GS’, the S10 rides more like a modernized 1150 than the 1200. Slower, heavier and more ponderous on the road, but at the same time more stable and perhaps a more relaxing long distance touring mount.

      • http://RideApart.com/ Wes Siler

        The words are based on a review Kev wrote for us before his death, but have been heavily altered, as is common media practice, to reflect the rest of the staff’s experience with the bike too.

        It receives an 8/10 because, even aping the GS, it’s still a great bike.

        • Stuki

          If that’s your idea of heavily altered, you guys could benefit from some work on your alteration skills…..

          http://www.ashonbikes.com/content/yamaha-super-t%C3%A9n%C3%A9r%C3%A9-test

        • Fyodor

          Hardly “heavily altered”, Mr Siler. It’s virtually word for word the review originally written by Kevin for his own site in 2010 – and still available to view there. It’s a shame – especially in view of his recent decease – that you haven’t seen fit to credit it appropriately…

          • http://RideApart.com/ Wes Siler

            Yes. A review which was licensed to us and which appeared here too.

            Any time the impressions and conclusions of a piece are altered to reflect group experience, the byline becomes that of the group. The intent isn’t to obfuscate or remove credit, but to reflect the collaborative nature of the product and protect the individual from blowback on conclusions they may or may not agree with.

            Kevin was a good friend of mine, a supporter of RideApart and a contributor. As a fellow media professional, he would have agreed with the decision to publish this collaborative piece under our group byline, as is accepted standard practice across publishing.

  • Louis

    I love it !

    just had mine for a month now, 1800 miles in Los Angeles

    I love the powerful engine, the two modes, the breaking and the safe feeling as well as the ride at two

    I wish they had made a better windshield, as both, normal and optional large one, are not doing the job for me

    I wish it had defended me against the car that rear ended me last week, because 576 lbs on you leg between two cars is kind of heavy ….except that ..hope to ride soon (I meant in 8-10 weeks!)

  • SL0WHARE

    Kevin’s own BMW bias screams from this report. Pinch of salt I’d say. ST over the GS any day of the week.

  • Professor Wizard

    Don’t let this review fool you…The Yamaha Super Tenere is a superb machine…There is a huge BMW bias in this article, and while the BMW may be a bit lighter, the Yamaha has legendary reliability and hence barely any noted problems since its European introduction in 2010. The Yamaha will still be going strong at 50,000 and even 100,000 miles while the BMW will have the rear drive caught on fire, toasted, and been in the repair shop multiple times leading to thousands of dollars in repair bills…The super tenere is the best bike I have ever owned (and I have owned over 40 of them)! I love mine and expect to have it for a decade or more…

  • Winter Coats

    Among lot of yahama bikes somes are really good but those are costly you can check all from http://www.ifuturetechnology.in/yahama-bike

  • jon

    Yamaha Super Tenere review from new purchase to sale after 3
    years

    Background – I’ve been riding for 35 years and do a 4,000
    mile trip each year. On this bike I’ve been to Portugal, the Amalfi Coast and
    the Alps. After 3 years of use I’ve decided to go back to Vstrom’s as I’ve had
    3 before. Here are my thoughts on the XT1200

    Pros·
    Excellent Headlights·
    Excellent seat – I did Lake Garda, Italy to London in one day [950 miles] with no problems
    Good vibration free mirrors·
    Unobtrusive trouble free shaft drive
    Reasonable tank range at 220+

    Cons
    Heritage – the much vaunted Paris-Dakar heritage gives you a bike with spoked wheels and a sticker with a sand dune on it. If you take this to the real desert [I’ve lived in Dubai] and drop the bike, you’re going to die if help doesn’t come because you can’t pick up a 267kg bike on soft sand or mud. So dirt tracks are what this is for and what all the promotional videos show
    Weight – many reviews say how light the bike feels when it’s moving. Frankly once any weight bike is moving its easy to keep up. It’s low speed manoeuvring, particularly with a pillion, that will have you
    gingerly moving around fearing a drop. This is my main reason for getting rid of it
    Luggage – once you have established this is not an off-road bike you might then look at whether it makes a good tourer. Luggage is high up for me. The luggage is plastic with aluminium sidings. Neither top box or panniers can hold a helmet. The Panniers are rectangular and if your pillion has short legs they
    will find it uncomfortable getting their legs to sit over the panniers. The locks periodically shake loose in the housings and have to be tightened and the method of attaching the luggage will amaze you with the multiple operations required compared to, say, Givi’s Monokey system. The soft inner luggage will quickly shed the zip pulls as they break off insude the boxes. Finally, the ignition key used to open the
    boxes protrudes 2 inches and could easily be accidentally bent when in the lock. I had a spare made to avoid this
    Residuals – I paid £14.5k for this bike and got £5.6 part exchange for a Vstrom. The value plummets faster than the GS it’s meant to be up against
    Radiator – the radiator fan blows hot air over your left leg and travelling through Spain in 43C it brought home that you don’t want to go to the desert on this thing.
    Insurance – I park it on the road in London. Because so few people bought this bike insurers were loth to insure me as they didn’t know how to price it. The day I bought it the Yamaha recommended insurance agent refused to insure it as it wasn’t on their books and I finally found one company that would insure me for £700. Over 3 years I’ve got that down to £500 but its something to watch out for. BTW I have 9 years no claims.
    Cachet – While I’ve had this bike my pal has had a GS1200 and Multistrada 1200. Nobody looks at the SuperTenere against those bikes. This partly explains the terrible residuals.

  • Reidy

    professor wizard i couldnt agree more i have had over 40 bikes also and the latest a super tenere Love it A good bang for buck and a long laster